Lorraine Hansberry died just three months after The Sign in Sidney Brustein's Window began its debut on Broadway in 1964. But even in her last days, she was revising the script from her sick bed based on notes brought over from the theatre. The work, in some ways, can be considered unfinished鈥擧ansberry faced so many challenges in its final stages. That鈥檚 one of the reasons it鈥檚 not as well-known as her A Raisin in the Sun. But it doesn't mean the play isn't as challenging or provocative; while Raisin is about a Black family navigating a racist America, The Sign in Sidney Brustein's Window is about whiteness.
The work is now receiving its second Broadway revival (its first in 1972 only had nine previews and five performances) at the James Earl Jones Theatre. Opening April 27, the production transferred from the Brooklyn Academy of Music where it ran February 4-March 19. Rachel Brosnahan (The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel) and Oscar Isaac (Star Wars) have transferred with the production, along with the complete company. 鈥淚n some ways, I feel like I'm approaching it like a musician. There's this beautiful, forgotten Bach piece. We get to sharpen up our instruments, go out and play the piece for people so they can hear it,鈥� Isaac shares about his experience working on the play. 鈥淚 think that's part of the excitement about playing it."
Brosnahan and Isaac play a married couple living a Bohemian life in 1960s Greenwich Village. Brosnahan plays Iris, a struggling actress, while Isaac is Sidney, a struggling intellectual. The question is: Can the marriage survive their barbed words and the pressure of Sidney鈥檚 progressive ideals? Despite being written nearly six decades ago, Hansberry鈥檚 incisive look into the progressive political movements and dynamics of marriage 鈥渇eels modern,鈥� as Brosnahan puts it: 鈥淚t鈥檚 a conversation about dominantly white intellectuals, the new wave of a progressive movement, and a new wave of feminism that was happening in the 1960s. But all those same conversations feel like [the ones] we鈥檙e having today.鈥�
Adds Isaac: 鈥淚t鈥檚 speaking to people that feel a bit disenfranchised by the whole political game.鈥� He also calls the play Hansberry鈥檚 鈥渃all to care.鈥� As he astutely points out, there鈥檚 an exhaustion in those who are politically and socially active over the long haul, a trial which his character Sidney faces. For the actor, the play is asking, 鈥淗ow do you continue to care, to stay engaged鈥攅ven when you don鈥檛 know the right answer, even when you don鈥檛 know what to do?鈥� These core explorations appear alongside Hansberry calling out the fallible white allies who still need to learn, to grow, and to recommit themselves to the cause.
These are questions audience will be faced with in real time as they get to know Sidney, whose progressivism is marred by male chauvinism and the use of homophobic slurs. Isaac finds him ultimately redeemable, saying, 鈥淗e鈥檚 trying, and he cares.鈥� To the actor, Hansberry delivers a complex look at an ally who still has work to do. 鈥淚 think that鈥檚 part of the beauty of what she鈥檚 writing about; she鈥檚 not allowing any easy judgments,鈥� Isaac shares. 鈥淪he reveals a bursting humanity. It鈥檚 complicated, it鈥檚 ugly, and it鈥檚 very, very alive.鈥� In his opinion, so often one鈥檚 faults (and problematic opinions) become the end of the conversation today, but Hansberry refuses for that to be the case in The Sign in Sidney Brustein鈥檚 Window. The conversation must continue. There鈥檚 no such thing as cancellation in Hansberry鈥檚 world.
For Brosnahan, Iris鈥檚 struggle is one of self-actualization. As the middle sister of three, she is placed directly between the second wave feminism of her elder sister and the third wave of her younger. Caught between tradition and progressivism, Iris asks new questions about who she is and who she wants to be. 鈥淲e meet her at a moment of enormous change,鈥� the actor says. At the core of Iris is an intelligent, resourceful, and honest character who has always orchestrated the changes in her life from leaving her small hometown to searching for a man like Sidney. As Brosnahan explains, 鈥淔or a long time, that satiated her. And now we're finding her in a moment where she feels stagnant. And she's not quite sure how to get what she needs next.鈥�
One can鈥檛 help but draw the parallels between Iris and The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel鈥檚 title character. In the television series, now in its fourth season, Brosnahan plays Midge, a 1960s housewife. After Midge鈥檚 husband tells her he wants a divorce, she decides to become a comedian. While Midge comes from the Upper West Side and pursuing tradition, she ultimately pioneers a path for herself in a male-dominated profession with natural confidence and charisma.
When it comes to the characters of Midge versus Iris, Brosnahan finds them to be 鈥渁lmost opposite, in both the obvious ways, and ways with a bit more nuance.鈥� Unlike Midge, Iris 鈥渋sn't quite certain how she wants to use鈥� her voice yet. Though that doesn鈥檛 stop Iris from trying to figure out how: from singing and acting in the theatre, to standing up to Sidney. Says Brosnahan, 鈥淪he鈥檚 beginning to know that she needs something different than what she has. She wants to forge her own path, and clarify it for no one else but herself.鈥� One of Iris鈥� biggest obstacles? Her husband.

With such tension, the drama between Iris and Sidney unfolds in verbal spats. Some of the dynamics at play between Iris and Sidney include a significant age gap, and Sidney鈥檚 sense of intellectual superiority. As a struggling actress, Iris finds herself trapped in the roles men want her to play for them at work, and at home. She appeases Sidney until she can no longer sustain playing a role she鈥檚 tired of.
The layers of their marriage, good and bad, mean that the audience ultimately sees the characters at their highest and their lowest. It requires the actors to embody 鈥渢he ugliness鈥� and 鈥減athetic-ness鈥� of these characters, something to which Isaac says Brosnahan is, 鈥渢otally committed,鈥� adding, 鈥淚 think for us, it's going to be about finding the joy in the game, within all that kind of ugliness that we're saying to each other, with all of the salt and vinegar鈥攆inding the honey that you hear, as well.鈥�
How does one process the constant switch in their marriage from spewing vitriol to loving connection? For Isaac, he鈥檚 calls it, 鈥減art of their game.鈥� If that phrase does little to reassure your doubts about how healthy Iris and Sidney鈥檚 marriage is, you鈥檙e not alone. 鈥淚t's wrong by all our modern standards, and yet there鈥檚 kind of a deeper honesty beneath it,鈥� says Isaac.
In portraying such a volatile romantic relationship, how have Isaac and Brosnahan built up their own relationship as colleagues? 鈥淚 think the two really important things are trust and boundaries,鈥� Isaac answers. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 what the first deal is about, establishing a real understanding about what it is we're doing and how we're doing it together.鈥�
Trust is also at the core of Brosnahan鈥檚 takeaway from the play on what makes or breaks a marriage. 鈥淢ore specifically,鈥� she says, 鈥渋t鈥檚 the ability to trust that you can change together, and a commitment to changing together.鈥�
Despite the play鈥檚 heavy questions, and sometimes-unlikeable central characters, Brosnahan and Isaac find optimism in The Sign in Sidney Brustein鈥檚 Window. 鈥淟orraine was someone who believed deeply in people and their ability to change,鈥� Brosnahan says. It鈥檚 an important element to the dramatic value of the play, as that possibility for redemption is vital for audiences to invest in and connect with the work鈥檚 characters. At the end of the day, humans don鈥檛 completely change overnight; instead it鈥檚 a series of small steps. When it comes to Iris, Brosnahan points out, 鈥渟he's the only person who leaves. And she also comes back, but she's not exactly where she started.鈥� As the actor says about Hansberry, 鈥淚 appreciate that she鈥檚 acknowledging that even small change is hopeful.鈥�
This article was originally published February 8, 2023.
See the cast take their Broadway bows below.